CUHK
News Centre
Survey Findings on the HKSAR Government’s Popularity in April 2017Released by Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies at CUHK
A telephone survey was conducted from 20 to 25 April 2017 by the Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong to study the popularity of the HKSAR Government. 751 respondents aged 18 or above were successfully interviewed, with a response rate of 38.3%. The sampling error is estimated at plus or minus 3.58 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
Major findings are summarized as follows:
Satisfaction with the HKSAR Government. According to the current survey, 37.5% of the 751 respondents expressed dissatisfaction towards the HKSAR Government, 25.4% said they were satisfied, and 36.0% answered ‘in-between’. The corresponding figures for March 2017 were 38.6%, 22.7%, and 37.5%, respectively. Statistical analysis shows that results for April 2017 were not statistically significantly different from those for last month.
Rating of Chief Executive LEUNG Chun-ying. The current survey showed that the performance rating of the Chief Executive (with a point scale ranging from 0 to 100 with 50 as the passing mark) stood at 41.4 on average, whereas the rating for last month was 41.2. However, the difference was not statistically significant.
Ratings of Three Secretaries. The ratings of Chief Secretary for Administration (Matthew CHEUNG), Financial Secretary (Paul CHAN), and Secretary for Justice (Rimsky YUEN) in April 2017 were 52.7, 44.6, and 44.8 respectively. The corresponding figures in March 2017 were 52.3, 43.5, and 43.1. No statistically significant differences were observed in the ratings of three secretaries between March 2017 and April 2017.
Trust in the HKSAR and the Central Governments. As of April 2017, 28.5% of the respondents showed trust in the HKSAR Government and 25.0% expressed distrust; 44.7% answered ‘in-between’. The results for March 2017 were 27.2%, 24.9%, and 46.2%, respectively. But none of the differences were statistically significant. As for the Central Government, 25.1% said they trusted it, 36.1% answered the opposite, and 32.9% said ‘in-between’ in the current survey. The respective figures from the previous month were 25.7%, 37.3%, and 30.2%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between March 2017 and April 2017.
Rating of Chief Executive-elect Carrie Lam. The current survey showed that the overall performance rating of the Chief Executive-elect (with a point scale ranging from 0 to 100 with 50 as the passing mark) was 54.5 on average, whereas the rating for last month was 54.0. The difference between April 2017 and March 2017 was not statistically significant.
